Professional associations

Yet another librarian decides not to renew his ALA membership. I don’t really know how big this trend is or how much it affects ALA, but it seems like librarians have gotten very vocal about dropping their memberships.

Is it that with blogs and wikis and other social software we no longer need professional associations to build a professional network? Is it that ALA has gotten more out of touch with its members? Or is it just that with the blogging explosion, people have a forum to share their frustrations with ALA?

I don’t belong to ALA, but I do belong to SLA and APLIC-I, and I find them very valuable. I am also fortunate enough to have an employer who is willing to pay my dues and most of my conference expenses. If I had to foot the bill, I am sure that I would look even more closely at the value of my memberships.

There are not many librarians in my particular field (population research), so I value APLIC-I for putting me in contact with those librarians. I get advice, news from the field, and a fantastic resource-sharing network. I’ve had the opportunity to write for the newsletter, present at a conference, and participate in leadership and conference planning. The conference brings together about 40 people who have similar work environments, and is very productive. Both the membership and the conference fees are cheap by ALA or SLA standards. If I worked in a less specialized environment, I might get the same value from a regional or state library association.

I value SLA for putting me in contact with the librarians in my local chapter. Even though I work in a large university, I am not part of the library system and might not meet these colleagues otherwise. I also value my subject division for programs at the conference, and the conference for giving me access to speakers with national recognition. Both the chapter and the division have provided leadership opportunities. The membership and conference fees are both expensive, though, and if I had to foot the bill myself, I would think twice about it.

I belonged to ALA as a student member and during my stint as a public librarian. I found the job fair at the conference very useful as a student, mainly to get some interview experience without having to travel. I found the programs overwhelming—the highlight for me was getting a book signed by Mick Foley at a YALSA event. As a public librarian, I liked getting American Libraries and discounts on READ posters, but I knew I’d never be able to afford to go to a national conference. I got more out of attending county level meetings and workshops.

I’m curious if associations don’t mean as much for Next-Gen Librarians or whatever we are, especially those who don’t have to publish and demonstrate service to the profession in order to get tenure. We can network informally online, and we can create wikis or join Flickr groups when we need more connections. Perhaps we think of joining associations like joining clubs—something our parents did, not something we do.

Nonetheless, the popularity of conference blogging and blogger meetups gives me hope. Regardless of how we feel about any particular association, I think we need a professional association to advocate for us, so I would hate to see them fade away.

3 comments on “Professional associations”

  1. Rebecca Says:

    Maybe if more associations provided more online networking opportunities, more of us would stay. I do enjoy the occasional full in-person conference, but I can’t make too many, so online opportunities are more valuable for me. I would preferentially join an association that provided more online networking. I am a member of ALA, but mostly so that I can be a part of the Distance Learning section of ACRL.

  2. Meredith Says:

    I love the discussions that come from meeting in person, but I don’t know that we need professional associations like ALA for that. We can just go to Computers in Libraries or one of the other conferences offered by for-profit companies. So much of what an association is and does can be accomplished online, in my opinion (as a known-nothing gen-x-er). Why do we need a bloated organization that spends $43 million a year (for our interests?).

  3. Tara Says:

    I think that we do still need professional associations to be advocates for the profession—in both public relations and in the legislative arena. Whether the two big associations currently represent the interests of the majority of librarians, and whether they are effective and efficient, are up for debate.

    As a public librarian, a conference like Computers in Libraries was just too expensive and wouldn’t have given me what I wanted from a conference. In my current position, it would probably fill the gap nicely, although it’s still expensive compared to SLA.

Write a comment